Why zkML? Because Tencent’s latest developer report shows that over 50% of new production code is now AI-generated, with 90%+ of engineers using AI coding assistants daily.
Software is no longer manually authored — it’s produced by models at scale.
When AI shapes the logic that runs real systems, how do we verify the reasoning behind that code?
2/
AI-generated code defines:
- Service behavior
- Failure recovery paths
- System coordination
- Security boundaries
This isn’t “autocomplete.” It’s AI determining how systems operate in production.
Correctness becomes a reasoning assurance problem — not a formatting problem.
3/
zkML enables verifiable code generation:
- Proof the model followed the intended development policy
- Proof no unintended logic branches were introduced
- Without exposing proprietary architectures or internal repos
When execution logic is determined by a model, verifying its reasoning equals verifying the system itself.
4/
Imagine development where:
✅Every function ships with a cryptographic execution trace
✅Enterprises can audit behavior without revealing codebases
✅Software supply chains trust code through verifiability, not statements
zkML makes code production auditable at scale.
5/
As AI becomes the author of software, trust must shift from belief → to verification.
That’s what @PolyhedraZK is building: verifiable intelligence at the code execution layer.
2,657
12
本頁面內容由第三方提供。除非另有說明，OKX 不是所引用文章的作者，也不對此類材料主張任何版權。該內容僅供參考，並不代表 OKX 觀點，不作為任何形式的認可，也不應被視為投資建議或購買或出售數字資產的招攬。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情況下，此類人工智能生成的內容可能不準確或不一致。請閱讀鏈接文章，瞭解更多詳情和信息。OKX 不對第三方網站上的內容負責。包含穩定幣、NFTs 等在內的數字資產涉及較高程度的風險，其價值可能會產生較大波動。請根據自身財務狀況，仔細考慮交易或持有數字資產是否適合您。