Manual clicks cap a chain’s ceiling. What lifts it is autonomous flow and that’s exactly where @Talus_Labs agents on Sui make sense: they run verifiable workflows (Nexus) while Sui’s object-centric Move model gives them real asset authority and low-latency execution. I double-checked the Litepaper/Whitepaper Talus explicitly picked Sui for on-chain logic security + the flexible object model + parallelism, i.e., the stack you need when interactions get high-frequency. We’re also in the final sprint of the testnet/leaderboards, so if you want to feel the difference between “bots” and agents, now’s the time. The incentives thread (cash + points) is live, but the bigger story is throughput meeting autonomy: agents compose tools, leaders coordinate off-chain calls, and settlement lands transparently on Sui. ❯ Spin one loop today: monitor → decide → act (e.g., price spike alert → policy → on-chain post). ❯ Watch how Sui’s object model keeps permissions clean while the workflow stays fast. Talus labs ❯ If you’re technical, peek the nexus-sdk activity and wire a tiny Tool; production rails are there. Net: autonomous DeFi, AvA matchups, and complex dApps don’t happen with manual clicks they happen when agents think and act at chain speed. Talus provides the brain/hand; Sui supplies the reflexes. I’m tracking how many agents keep winning loops after rewards end that’s the real adoption tell.