Tokenomic Improvement suggestions for Ronin:
- Reduce supply by 100m
- Slow down inflation (for SM and for stakers)
- Lengthen the SM unlocks by given out fewer tokens each period
- Lock in commitment for longer
- Increase transaction cost on botted contracts (Machines Arena)
- Increase revenue
- Add optional GAS STATION where users can voluntarily watch ads to earn $ron. All revenue is used to buy $ron. Half is burned, half is sent to user once advertisement payments are paid by ad company.
- Enshrine buy and burn $ron with 50% of daily inflows to Ronin Treasury
@Ronin_Network $ron
This is the $ron unlock schedule. A couple things.
Why are we giving all SM tokens out by 2028? I think that should be stretched out to a longer time frame. i think now that we are almost in 2026, it makes sense to stretch that out to 2031 to align for the longer term.
I think we should consider reducing total supply by updating our tokenomic design. i don't know what number is right, but let's use removing 100m as an example.
total supply goes from 1 billion to 900 million overnight by removing 100m of unreleased supply from the tokenomics design.
We update the supply schedule to release fewer tokens each period proportionally to all compartments.
Based on each compartments' allocation distribution percentages, that would mean:
29.6m less RON to SM
24.7m less RON to Community Incentives
32.8m less RON to Staking
12.9m less RON to Ecosystem
Fewer tokens.
Removing 10% of unreleased supply from the tokenomics design (1b -> 900 total $ron supply) and spreading the amount of tokens released each unlock period out would bring our fully diluted valuation down from $271 to $244 million overnight.
Each token instantly becomes a greater part of total $ron supply. Staking rewards go down. SM rewards go down. All rewards go down.
Are we willing to take fewer coins each day from RON staking rewards to reduce supply and inflation? It would mean SM gets fewer rewards too.
@Ronin_Network
1.96 K
47
El contenido al que estás accediendo se ofrece por terceros. A menos que se indique lo contrario, OKX no es autor de la información y no reclama ningún derecho de autor sobre los materiales. El contenido solo se proporciona con fines informativos y no representa las opiniones de OKX. No pretende ser un respaldo de ningún tipo y no debe ser considerado como un consejo de inversión o una solicitud para comprar o vender activos digitales. En la medida en que la IA generativa se utiliza para proporcionar resúmenes u otra información, dicho contenido generado por IA puede ser inexacto o incoherente. Lee el artículo enlazado para más detalles e información. OKX no es responsable del contenido alojado en sitios de terceros. Los holdings de activos digitales, incluidos stablecoins y NFT, suponen un alto nivel de riesgo y pueden fluctuar mucho. Debes considerar cuidadosamente si el trading o holding de activos digitales es adecuado para ti según tu situación financiera.