I usually try to stay uninvolved from those "this is bad, use our product" talks regardless of who's standing on both ends since I believe it's are net-negative for the industry, but here I'd like to make a few friendly technical corrections: 1. "Liquidity is not isolated." - If utilization in a low-risk market rises, lenders are earning high APY (30%+ last week) by lending to ETH and BTC (until new depositors come to collect this yield, so you can withdraw if you wish), so I can't really take that as a serious argument. 2. "Can't raise interest rates." - Adding to the above (rates will rise if utilization spikes above kink based on current IRM), but let's assume you'd want to alter the IRM urgently, considering IRM is a market parameter in the form of an address, technically, it can be upgraded despite market immutability. Although, afaik it'd need to be pre-whitelisted by the DAO (not sure if this is necessary tho). 3. "Can't update oracles." - Another address parameter (I hope we're all aware of this), so again, doable. This time no whitelisting is needed. For (2) and (3), the question remains, however, who should be the party that can upgrade IRM and oracle, which is relevant from the perspective of the market being (re)used by multiple curators. Yappa-yappa if you ask me - In Morpho curators+users need to "trust" this party, in Aave it's *only* users since no other "curator". 4. "Can't alter risk parameters to limit collateral exposure." - Caps, inflows, outflows, are configurable on the curator level. Now while I agree those parameters are easier and quicker to adjust in Aave I would propose refraining from stating what is obviously not true (for the sake of... well, basically anything), since this is all technically feasible on Morpho, but not really an "operational" state of the protocol at the moment (fyi upgradable oracles are actually already in use on some markets). Next time, I'd suggest focusing on the inability to freeze withdrawals when FUDing Morpho infra as that's technically impossible. Aave can do that via Guardian msig afaik.
1/ Every architecture involves tradeoffs. Good design allows you to design a system where, for every unit of risk you take, you earn the most reward, and for every unit of reward you take, you incur the least risk. From a liquidity risk PoV, Morpho's model is suboptimal.
7,952
37
本页面内容由第三方提供。除非另有说明,欧易不是所引用文章的作者,也不对此类材料主张任何版权。该内容仅供参考,并不代表欧易观点,不作为任何形式的认可,也不应被视为投资建议或购买或出售数字资产的招揽。在使用生成式人工智能提供摘要或其他信息的情况下,此类人工智能生成的内容可能不准确或不一致。请阅读链接文章,了解更多详情和信息。欧易不对第三方网站上的内容负责。包含稳定币、NFTs 等在内的数字资产涉及较高程度的风险,其价值可能会产生较大波动。请根据自身财务状况,仔细考虑交易或持有数字资产是否适合您。